English 
Français 
Español 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
العربية Compare
Kilo vs the platforms you’re already evaluating
Honest, date-stamped comparisons. Every competitor fact on these pages is checked against their live public website, docs, and pricing — and where a platform beats us, the table says so.
Use this IoT platform comparison hub to compare IoT platforms side by side — device management, data visualization and dashboards, rules and automation, connectivity (LoRaWAN, mioty, MQTT), and pricing — and choose the best IoT platform for your deployment.
How these comparisons work
Facts, not swipes: each page names what the other platform genuinely does well, and every claim in their column comes from their own public pages.
Date-stamped: each page carries a “Last verified” date. If pricing or features change after that date, tell us and we’ll fix it.
Both sides win somewhere: rows where the other platform is ahead stay in the table. Trust is worth more than a clean sweep.
How we compare IoT platforms
Every comparison scores both platforms against the same evaluation criteria — the axes buyers actually shortlist on, including the one almost every ranking ignores: production readiness.
- Device management — onboarding, device templates, payload normalization, Device Digital Twins
- Connectivity — built-in LoRaWAN and mioty network servers, MQTT, cellular devices and global IoT SIMs
- Data visualization — dashboards, widgets, maps, and a 3D digital building twin with live sensor binding
- Rules & automation — the rules engine itself (Kilo runs its own BPMN 2.0 engine with CEL expressions, not a rebadged Node-RED), alerts, escalation workflows, AI assistance
- Production readiness — versioning, build & test before deploy, step-through debugging, one-click rollback
- Pricing — free tiers, entry plans, and how usage is metered
Best IoT platforms we’re compared to
The platforms buyers most often shortlist alongside Kilo, and what each is genuinely strong at:
- akenza Swiss self-service IoT platform with transparent per-device pricing and a low-code rule engine.
- ChirpStack Open-source (MIT) self-hosted LoRaWAN network server with a deep gateway ecosystem.
- Datacake LoRaWAN-first low-code IoT platform with a free built-in network server and 436+ device templates.
- Losant Enterprise IoT application-enablement platform (a SUSE company) with white-label experiences and industrial edge compute.
- TagoIO Developer-friendly IoT platform with 500+ device connectors and code-based Analysis scripting.
- The Things Stack The reference LoRaWAN network server, with the public community network and de-facto device repository.
- ThingsBoard Open-source IoT platform (Apache 2.0) with 600+ dashboard widgets and a mature rule-chain engine.
- Ubidots IoT dashboard and data visualization SaaS with 20+ widget types and UbiFunctions scripting.
Compare
IoT platforms
Full application platforms — dashboards, rules, alarms, device management.
Kilo vs akenza
Kilo vs akenza: which IoT platform fits your deployment?
Verified 2026-07-02
Learn more →
Kilo vs Datacake
Kilo vs Datacake: which IoT platform fits your deployment?
Verified 2026-07-02
Learn more →
Kilo vs Losant
Kilo vs Losant: which IoT platform fits your deployment?
Verified 2026-07-02
Learn more →
Kilo vs TagoIO
Kilo vs TagoIO: which IoT platform fits your deployment?
Verified 2026-07-02
Learn more →
Kilo vs ThingsBoard
Kilo vs ThingsBoard: which IoT platform fits your deployment?
Verified 2026-07-02
Learn more →
Kilo vs Ubidots
Kilo vs Ubidots: which IoT platform fits your deployment?
Verified 2026-07-02
Learn more →
Compare
LoRaWAN network servers
Connectivity-layer stacks that pair with an application platform like Kilo.
Compare
IoT platform comparison FAQ
Which IoT platform is best?
It depends on your deployment. If you want deep open-source control, ThingsBoard or ChirpStack are strong; if visualization SaaS is the priority, Ubidots and Datacake shine; if you want an AI-first IoT platform (AIoT) with built-in LoRaWAN and mioty network servers, live dashboards with a 3D building twin, and flat pricing, Kilo is built for that. One axis most rankings skip: production readiness — most platforms deploy automation straight to production and hope, while Kilo builds, tests, and versions every rule before deployment, with one-click rollback. Each comparison page ends with an honest “choose them if / choose Kilo if” list against the same criteria.
How do you verify competitor facts?
Every claim in a competitor’s column is checked against their own live public website, docs, and pricing pages on the “Last verified” date shown on each page. Rows where the competitor is ahead stay in the table, and if you spot something outdated we fix it.
Is Kilo open source?
No — Kilo is a commercial AIoT platform with a free tier (5 devices, commercial use allowed) and flat paid plans from €25/month, deployable as cloud SaaS or on-premise. If open source is a hard requirement, our ThingsBoard and ChirpStack comparisons say so plainly and explain what you take on operationally in exchange.
Do these comparisons cover LoRaWAN network servers too?
Yes — besides full application platforms, we compare Kilo with connectivity-layer stacks: The Things Stack and ChirpStack. Kilo includes a built-in LoRaWAN and mioty network server on every plan, so those pages focus on when a standalone network server plus a separate application layer makes sense instead.